Auckland, New Zealand

AI helped make
the decision.
You still have to defend it.

When you use AI to help hire, discipline, or dismiss, the decision still has to hold up at the Employment Relations Authority. Lex Praxis helps New Zealand employers use AI in their people decisions — and stand behind them.

Scroll
20+
Years in employment law
3–5
Day audit turnaround
NZ
Employment law focus
s103A
Employment Relations Act

Not a technology vendor selling AI to employers. A legal specialist who understands the tools — and the law they have to answer to.

Lex Praxis was founded by Melt Strydom — a former barrister with more than 20 years in employment law, investigations, and dispute resolution. He built the practice around a problem employers are only starting to see: AI is now shaping hiring, performance, and dismissal decisions, and someone still has to answer for those decisions when they are challenged. Lex Praxis starts with the law and works back to the tools, never the other way around.

The result is practical guidance you can rely on — because it comes from someone who has sat across the table from the Authority, drafted the agreements, and run the personal grievances himself.

About Melt
"Employers are already using AI to help make the decisions that used to take real deliberation — a warning, a restructure, a dismissal. AI can produce the content in seconds. What it cannot do is stand behind the decision when it reaches the Authority. That part is still the job, and it is the part I do."

— Melt Strydom, Principal

⚖️

Legal expertise first

Every framework, audit, and recommendation starts with how New Zealand employment law actually works — not with what the technology can do. The law sets the standard; the AI has to meet it.

🛠

Practical, not theoretical

The work is built around the decisions you actually make — warning letters, restructures, redundancy processes, and personal grievances — and where AI helps or quietly creates risk in each. No generic AI theory.

🧭

The people-side advisor

Employment law, Health and Safety at Work Act psychosocial duties, and responsible AI use, brought together in one place — the intersection most AI advisers in New Zealand do not cover.

You Can't Manage What You Don't See

Understand your AI exposure before it becomes a liability.

Most organisations are already using AI — in hiring, performance management, investigations, even decisions about restructuring. Few know exactly where, how, or what that means under New Zealand employment law.

The AI Employment Risk Audit gives you that clarity. In 3–5 days, we map your current or intended AI use against your actual obligations under the Employment Relations Act, Privacy Act, and Health and Safety at Work Act. You get a graded risk assessment, a one-page summary with recommended next steps, and the confidence that you know where you stand.

Schedule a Consultation

Five questions every HR team should be able to answer about AI.

If you advise on hiring, discipline, restructures, or dismissals, AI is already in that work — drafting the letter, summarising the file, shaping the rationale. This free checklist shows where the gap between using AI and being able to defend the decision at the Authority tends to open first, grounded in New Zealand case law and the Employment Relations Act.

Takes five minutes. No follow-up sequence.

Get the free checklist
01
Do you know which AI tools your people are actually using?
02
Has any confidential or employee information been uploaded to a public AI tool?
03
Does your organisation have a written AI use policy?
+ two more questions in the full checklist →

Ready to work differently?

Whether you are mapping your AI exposure, tightening your policies, or facing an Employment Relations challenge, we would like to hear from you.

Start the Conversation Book a Discovery Call